본문으로 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

사용자별 맞춤메뉴

자주찾는 메뉴

추가하기
닫기

연구성과

contents area

detail content area

Machine Learning Based Hierarchical Classification of Frontotemporal Dementia and Alzheimer's ...
  • 작성일2020-02-07
  • 최종수정일2020-02-10
  • 담당부서연구기획과
  • 연락처043-719-8033
  • 924

Neuroimage: Clinical, 2019. 01, 101811-, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2019.101811


Machine Learning Based Hierarchical Classification of Frontotemporal Dementia and Alzheimer's Disease

Jun Pyo Kim, Jeonghun Kim;Yu Hyun Park;Seong Beom Park;Jin San Lee;Sole Yoo;Eun-Joo Kim;Hee Jin Kim;Duk L. Na;Jesse A. Brown;Samuel N. Lockhart;Sang Won Seo;Joon-Kyung Seong


Abstract

    Background

    In a clinical setting, an individual subject classification model rather than a group analysis would be more informative. Specifically, the subtlety of cortical atrophy in some frontotemporal dementia (FTD) patients and overlapping patterns of atrophy among three FTD clinical syndromes including behavioral variant FTD (bvFTD), non-fluent/agrammatic variant primary progressive aphasia (nfvPPA), and semantic variant PPA (svPPA) give rise to the need for classification models at the individual level. In this study, we aimed to classify each individual subject into one of the diagnostic categories in a hierarchical manner by employing a machine learning-based classification method.

    Methods

    We recruited 143 patients with FTD, 50 patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) dementia, and 146 cognitively normal subjects. All subjects underwent a three-dimensional volumetric brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan, and cortical thickness was measured using FreeSurfer. We applied the Laplace Beltrami operator to reduce noise in the cortical thickness data and to reduce the dimension of the feature vector. Classifiers were constructed by applying both principal component analysis and linear discriminant analysis to the cortical thickness data. For the hierarchical classification, we trained four classifiers using different pairs of groups: Step 1 - CN vs. FTD + AD, Step 2 - FTD vs. AD, Step 3 - bvFTD vs. PPA, Step 4 - svPPA vs. nfvPPA. To evaluate the classification performance for each step, we used a10-fold cross-validation approach, performed 1000 times for reliability.

    Results

    The classification accuracy of the entire hierarchical classification tree was 75.8%, which was higher than that of the non-hierarchical classifier (73.0%). The classification accuracies of steps 1–4 were 86.1%, 90.8%, 86.9%, and 92.1%, respectively. Changes in the right frontotemporal area were critical for discriminating behavioral variant FTD from PPA. The left frontal lobe discriminated nfvPPA from svPPA, while the bilateral anterior temporal regions were critical for identifying svPPA.

    Conclusions

    In the present study, our automated classifier successfully classified FTD clinical subtypes with good to excellent accuracy. Our classifier may help clinicians diagnose FTD subtypes with subtle cortical atrophy and facilitate appropriate specific interventions.



  • 본 연구는 질병관리본부 연구개발과제연구비를 지원받아 수행되었습니다.
  • This research was supported by a fund by Research of Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.


본 공공저작물은 공공누리  출처표시 조건에 따라 이용할 수 있습니다 본 공공저작물은 공공누리 "출처표시" 조건에 따라 이용할 수 있습니다.
TOP